|
مقاله
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Title:
|
Comparison of effect of PRK surgery by 3 methodes(conventional,iris registration,spherical equivalent) in correcting astigmatism<1.00 D and Higher Order Aberrations in myopic- astigmatic patients
|
Author(s):
|
Baradaran Rafii AR,MD;Ahmadi Gheshrbat V,Msc;Moradi S,Msc
|
Presentation Type:
|
Poster
|
Subject:
|
Cornea and Anterior Segment
|
Others:
|
|
Presenting Author:
|
|
Name:
|
Vajihe Ahmadi gheshrbat
|
Affiliation :(optional)
|
Ophthalmic research center,shahid beheshti university of medical sciences,tehran,iran
|
E mail:
|
Vajiheahmadi68@yahoo.com
|
Phone:
|
|
Mobile:
|
09129305229
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
To compare effects of Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) surgery by 3methodes (Conventional,IrisRegistration,Spherical Equivalent) in correcting astigmatism<1.00 D and Higher Order Aberrations in myopic- astigmatism patients
|
Methods:
|
The charts of 40 patients(72 eyes) undergoing PRK surgery for the correction of myopia with astigmatism<1.00D at the Bina Eye Center in Tehran City ,were respectively reviewed. Astigmatism and Higher Order Aberrations(HOAs) outcomes at 6monthes postoperatively were compared with initial data
|
Results:
|
Decreasing astigmatism after Conventional and Iris Registration PRK compared with increased astigmatism in SE PRK (p<0.001).Secondary Spherical Aberration increased in Conventional group in 4mm pupil(p=0.025). trefoil decreased in 4 mm pupil after surgery(p=0.005). Coma increased in 6mm pupil in Iris Registration groupe (p=0.024). Spherical aberration decreased in Iris Registration group in 4 mm pupil(p=0.001). In Spherical Equivalent group , Coma increased in 4 and 6 mm pupil and Spherical aberration increased just in 6 mm pupil (p=0.024)
|
Conclusion:
|
Despite SE PRK, Conventional and Iris Registration PRK can decreased amount of postoperative astigmatism .Total HOAs increased in Spherical Equivalent group more than two others
|
Attachment:
|
|
|